Argument final paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Argument final - Research Paper Exampleilable medical exam remedies, and so many patients suffering from these diseases argon made to endure severe and chronic pain, vomiting, difficulty in breathing, and other similar discomforts. They are often also made to endure such symptoms for long while and even months before they eventually die. In the interim, they often reach the point of wanting to end their suffering and pain by ending their life. Lacking the skill and the means to end it, these patients turn to their physicians to assist them in ending their life. But legalizing physician-assisted self-destruction (PAS) is a dangerous step which is very much against the basic principles of the medical practice. With such a premise, this paper shall discuss and support the thesis that physician-assisted suicide should not be made legal.An important consideration in the assisted suicide discussion is the fact that committing it is against the basic principle of non-maleficence or of n ot doing any harm to ones patient. The Hippocratic Oath which serves as the basic estimable mandate of the medical practice expressly prohibits physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (Finlay, 2005). This oath declares that a physician should not administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor result the physician suggest such a course (as cited by Demy and Stewart, 1998, p. 249). In the time of Hippocrates, assisted suicide and euthanasia were very much against the principles of medicine. In the current mise en scene however, assisted suicide and euthanasia are ideas which are new and opposite from the concepts of medicine and care (Walker, 2001). Those who support physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia also have different ideas on what it is to be a physician and what the moral boundaries of the practice are. It is also telling that the current public interest in PAS comes at a time when the palliative powers of American medicine are greater than they have ever be en in the past (Walker, 2001, p. 27). All in all,